Campaign Trail Results: Game #989191

This Game:

  • Year: 1860
  • Player Candidate: Abraham Lincoln
  • Running Mate: Cassius Clay
  • Difficulty Level: Impossible
  • Winner Take All Mode?: Yes
  • Game Played:
Previous Game Next Game
View overall results, or a specific state:
CandidateElectoral VotesPopular VotesPop. Vote %
---- Stephen A. Douglas1171,827,82939.21
---- John C. Breckinridge1171,163,62124.96
---- Abraham Lincoln361,066,10422.87
---- John Bell33603,61312.95

Answers:

  • How should your party address the slavery issue during this campaign?
    We must remain steadfast against the acquisition of new territories, and must combat the expansion of slavery to the extent permitted by the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision.
  • What do you have to say about the merits of your running mate, Cassius Clay?
    I'm proud to share a ballot with Cassius Clay of Kentucky.
  • To what extent do you plan to personally campaign in this election?
    Not at all. It would violate the norms of our times, and in any case we have a lead that we should preserve.
  • How aggressively should your party attack the Northern Democrats and Stephen A. Douglas in this election?
    Douglas and his party are running on the failed, dishonest policy of popular sovereignty. I want the Republicans to point this out at every opportunity.
  • How aggressively should your party attack the Constitutional Unionists and John Bell in this election?
    This party has no discernible platform or political positions on any issue. They are the carcass of the pro-slavery wing of the Whig Party, masquerading as saviors of the Union.
  • How aggressively should your party attack the Southern Democrats and John Breckenridge in this election?
    We will attack Southern Democrats the same as we would Northern Democrats. They represent the same ideas about slavery -- they differ only in their boldness about it.
  • What should your party's position be on the raid of John Brown, late in 1859?
    Clearly what John Brown did was illegal, but without the obstructionism and provocation of the South on slavery, it would have never come to pass.
  • Thousands of young men have formed paramilitary “Wide Awake” clubs and marched to support Republicans. Should your party embrace this support, or is it too divisive?
    Every party has political clubs and supporters. I'm proud that we have ours, and they will help drive us to victory in November.
  • Do you have any plans to reach out to your chief rival for the Republican nomination, William Seward, and reconcile?
    Our party rejected Seward because of his unpopularity in states like Illinois and Indiana. Let's wait until after the election before we extend the olive branch to him.
  • How much should your party emphasize its support of higher tariffs in this election?
    Our party supports a high tariff and I'm proud of that fact. We need to emphasize this point during our campaign.
  • How much should your party emphasize its support of a Transcontinental Railroad in this election?
    We might consider sacrificing on this issue if it would help appease the Deep South. I don't think we should mention it much in this campaign.
  • How much should your party emphasize its support of a homestead act in this election?
    The core belief of our party is that the federal territories should be settled by honest, free, hard-working men and their families. A homestead act would be right in line with this philosophy.
  • What position should your party take on foreign immigration and nationalization in this election?
    Germans are a key part of our new party and our vote in the Midwest. Let's express our support for the current naturalization laws.
  • What is your position on the Supreme Court's Dred Scott v. Sandford decision?
    We obviously cannot agree with this decision, but the Supreme Court lays down the law of the land, and we have little choice but to acquiesce.
  • What is your position on the social equality of blacks in American society?
    I don't believe that blacks and whites will ever mix socially in this nation, but that cannot change the fact that blacks are citizens of this nation, and should be given the voting and property rights to match that status.
  • Do you have anything to say about the efforts of some to reopen the Atlantic slave trade?
    I'm sure that these are just rumors and speculation. It would be irresponsible of me at this point to extend my obvious condemnation of this step.
  • Do you support the further expansion of the United States into Mexico, Cuba, or the Caribbean?
    I would have to see the specific situation being proposed before I could give my own opinion on the matter.
  • What is your position on the passage of “personal liberty laws” by various states, to flout the Fugitive Slave Act?
    The newer Fugitive Slave Law was the result of reasoned compromise in Congress. I may disagree with aspects of that Compromise, but I must accept it as a whole.
  • Should the proposed constitution for the state of Kansas be accepted by Congress, and Kansas admitted as a free state?
    I am willing to wait until the emotions surrounding this issue can recede a bit. If that means delaying the admission of Kansas, I will reluctantly accept that.
  • Would you support a compromise Amendment which permanently protected slavery in the Southern states, in return for no further expansion of the institution?
    I'm open to some kind of compromise that would provide guarantees on slavery in the South, as long as it would not allow the extension of slavery to new states or territories.
  • If any Southern state was to secede, would you use military force as President to preserve the Union?
    I doubt that things will come to that point, and we must not address this issue during our current campaign.
  • How much should your party emphasize its support of canals and infrastructure projects in this election?
    This is something we support, and we should emphasize that in our campaign this year. Anything we can do to broaden the debate beyond slavery is a good thing.
  • Cassius Clay has recently spoken of the need to “throw off the yoke of slavery”, which has reinforced his abolitionist reputation and alarmed many moderates. What is your stance on this?
    We can't afford too much infighting, but some kind of rebuke is essential. I will give a speech and make it a point to mention that I am not considering any type of hasty action on the slavery issue.
  • Is there a particular state that you believe the party should concentrate its resources into during the final days of the campaign?
    Ohio
  • We just need to let you know, it appears that your opponents have consolidated into a "fusion ticket" in the states of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York.
    I see. We shall do our best in any case.