Campaign Trail Results: Game #821428
Play The Campaign Trail
This Game:
- Year: 1844
- Player Candidate: James K. Polk
- Running Mate: George Dallas
- Difficulty Level: Hard
- Winner Take All Mode?: Yes
- Game Played:
- awinner
View overall results, or a specific state:
| Candidate | Electoral Votes | Popular Votes | Pop. Vote % |
|---|---|---|---|
| ---- Henry Clay | 248 | 1,432,223 | 52.88 |
| ---- James K. Polk | 27 | 1,162,420 | 42.91 |
| ---- John Tyler | 0 | 62,807 | 2.32 |
| ---- James Birney | 0 | 51,244 | 1.89 |
Answers:
- What points will emphasize in your acceptance letter, as you accept the Democratic nomination for President?I will express my support for the annexation of Texas, and a favorable resolution to the Oregon situation. On other issues, we will continue Van Buren's efforts to establish an Independent Treasury, and will move to reduce tariffs.
- You are known as a supporter of annexation on the Texas front. Do you have anything you would like to add, now that you have been nominated?I obtained my nomination based on the Texas issue, and people know that. We need to pivot now, and make the case for other parts of our platform.
- John Tyler is pleased with your position on the Texas issue, and is prepared to withdraw his candidacy. Can you give him assurances that certain appointees of his will be safe in their positions, should you be elected?John Tyler lacks any broad base of support. It's more important to reserve these appointments for loyal Democrats.
- Cassius Clay, a cousin of Henry Clay, has published a letter stating Henry Clay is in accord with the abolitionist movement. Should your party disseminate copies of this letter as an attack?Let's not appear too hasty here. We need to run as a national party and avoid alienating Northerners.
- Do you believe that any Southern Whig can call themselves a supporter of slavery, so long as Henry Clay equivocates on the Texas issue?We have the upper-hand here, and we need to hammer the Southern Whigs on their allegiance to a party that is drifting towards increasingly radical positions.
- Do you have any statement on the presence of Theodore Frelinghuysen on the Whig ticket, and his association with known anti-Catholic agitators?We won't have much to say about Frelinghuysen. He seems to avoided the vices which have plagued Henry Clay throughout his life.
- For better or worse, many view you as a protege of Andrew Jackson (some call you “Young Hickory”). Is it better to embrace this label, or to distance yourself from it?There's no need to talk about Andrew Jackson at this point. Let's focus on Texas and other issues of our current time, rather than rehashing the battles of a decade ago.
- Henry Clay supports the idea that the federal government should purchase the telegraph patent and manage the technology. To what extent should you attack him on this?We don't need to hammer on the internal improvements issue. We have other things to talk about which will better unite the party.
- Should your party attack Henry Clay's personal conduct? His gambling, womanizing, dueling, and generally irreligious nature?The passions of these times seem to be towards someone who is more righteous in their behavior. We should attack Clay's conduct, and especially in the Northeast.
- Silas Wright, the protege and successor to Van Buren, has been mentioned as a candidate for Governor of New York. He seems hesitant. Will you write him a letter imploring him to enter the race?This is an issue of state politics that I will stay removed from.
- There have recently been riots and armed clashes between nativists and Irish immigrants in Philadelphia and elsewhere. Do you have any plans to condemn the nativist violence in these episodes?Our national party should avoid addressing this issue.
- What do you make of Martin Van Buren's 1842 visit to Henry Clay's estate? Is Clay too friendly with Northern interests?This incident was a source of insinuation against Van Buren during the nomination battle. In the main election, however, we shouldn't mention anything that could cause a rift in the party.
- Would you support the annexation of Texas, even without an agreement with Mexico, and a possible war?The prospect of war with a backwards country such as Mexico should play no part in our calculations.
- What should your party's position be on the Tariff of 1842, which increased tariffs?We should avoid taking a strong position on this tariff. There are men in our party who stand on both sides of the issue.
- Do you believe that some revenue should be set aside from our tariffs to finance internal improvements, such as canals and roads?I don't believe that it is constitutional or advisable for the federal government to undertake an internal improvements program.
- What is your current position on the banking system?I stand for a national bank or an independent Treasury -- whichever can gain the most support. I would require any national bank to maintain a branch in every state.
- Do you support an Amendment that would limit the President to a single term in office?I don't support an Amendment on this issue, but I will personally promise not to run for reelection.
- Do you have any statement to make on John Calhoun's “Packenham Letter”, stating slavery to be a positive blessing, and justifying the annexation of Texas as a pro-slavery move?I disagree with John Calhoun across the board, which leads to my opposition to the annexation of Texas.
- Do you support any changes to our current naturalization laws?Only some very minor changes, like increasing the waiting period before new citizens may vote.
- Do you support any effort to establish a unified, national currency?I support a national bank, and one clear argument for the bank is the total chaos we've had with our currency since 1837.
- Do you agree with Robert Walker's letter, arguing that that slavery issue will be diluted by national expansion?I believe this letter to be disingenuous at best. Further expansion will reopen the debate on slavery rather than suppress it.
- After the unfortunate death of Abel Upshur in the Princeton explosion, John Calhoun succeeded him as Secretary of State. Was this a wise appointment by President Tyler?This is one of the most ill-conceived decisions I have seen in my lifetime.
- What is your position on the Oregon boundary question?We need to negotiate a permanent agreement with Great Britain that grants some of all of the Oregon Territory to the United States.
- Do you have any criticism of the authorities in Illinois, regarding their failure to properly protect Joseph Smith before his assassination in June?Regardless of our personal feelings, it always concerning when a religious leader and Presidential candidate can simply be killed by a mob.
- Is there a particular state where your party should concentrate its resources and most talented speakers as the election draws near?Ohio