Campaign Trail Results: Game #809920

This Game:

  • Year: 1844
  • Player Candidate: James K. Polk
  • Running Mate: Levi Woodbury
  • Difficulty Level: Impossible
  • Winner Take All Mode?: Yes
  • Game Played:
Previous Game Next Game
View overall results, or a specific state:
CandidateElectoral VotesPopular VotesPop. Vote %
---- Henry Clay2511,513,92355.76
---- James K. Polk241,087,05640.04
---- John Tyler062,4472.30
---- James Birney051,6641.90

Answers:

  • What points will emphasize in your acceptance letter, as you accept the Democratic nomination for President?
    I will open with a defense of the annexation of Texas, and then spend the rest of the letter attacking Henry Clay and his obfuscations on the issue.
  • You are known as a supporter of annexation on the Texas front. Do you have anything you would like to add, now that you have been nominated?
    We must annex Texas as soon as practicable.
  • John Tyler is pleased with your position on the Texas issue, and is prepared to withdraw his candidacy. Can you give him assurances that certain appointees of his will be safe in their positions, should you be elected?
    John Tyler lacks any broad base of support. It's more important to reserve these appointments for loyal Democrats.
  • Can you elaborate on why your allies intervened so strongly on behalf of Levi Woodbury, to be your running mate?
    Mr. Woodbury was a critical part of Jackson and Van Buren's Cabinets, and he has the right viewpoint on the Treasury and tariff questions.
  • Cassius Clay, a cousin of Henry Clay, has published a letter stating Henry Clay is in accord with the abolitionist movement. Should your party disseminate copies of this letter as an attack?
    Let's not appear too hasty here. We need to run as a national party and avoid alienating Northerners.
  • Do you believe that any Southern Whig can call themselves a supporter of slavery, so long as Henry Clay equivocates on the Texas issue?
    Mr. Clay has certainly shown unusual reticence on the Texas issue, but many Southern Whigs are perfectly fine people.
  • Do you have any statement on the presence of Theodore Frelinghuysen on the Whig ticket, and his association with known anti-Catholic agitators?
    We won't have much to say about Frelinghuysen. He seems to avoided the vices which have plagued Henry Clay throughout his life.
  • For better or worse, many view you as a protege of Andrew Jackson (some call you “Young Hickory”). Is it better to embrace this label, or to distance yourself from it?
    There's no need to talk about Andrew Jackson at this point. Let's focus on Texas and other issues of our current time, rather than rehashing the battles of a decade ago.
  • Henry Clay supports the idea that the federal government should purchase the telegraph patent and manage the technology. To what extent should you attack him on this?
    This sounds like the most ridiculous idea yet from Mr. Clay's long public career. I trust that enterprising individuals and companies will develop this technology.
  • Should your party attack Henry Clay's personal conduct? His gambling, womanizing, dueling, and generally irreligious nature?
    I don't think that personal conduct is a good issue to bring into this campaign.
  • Silas Wright, the protege and successor to Van Buren, has been mentioned as a candidate for Governor of New York. He seems hesitant. Will you write him a letter imploring him to enter the race?
    I will put my word in as a supporter of Silas Wright.
  • There have recently been riots and armed clashes between nativists and Irish immigrants in Philadelphia and elsewhere. Do you have any plans to condemn the nativist violence in these episodes?
    Our national party should avoid addressing this issue.
  • What do you make of Martin Van Buren's 1842 visit to Henry Clay's estate? Is Clay too friendly with Northern interests?
    This incident was a source of insinuation against Van Buren during the nomination battle. In the main election, however, we shouldn't mention anything that could cause a rift in the party.
  • Would you support the annexation of Texas, even without an agreement with Mexico, and a possible war?
    I would hope that we could negotiate an annexation with Mexico before moving forward, to avoid any diplomatic incidents.
  • What should your party's position be on the Tariff of 1842, which increased tariffs?
    We stand steadfast in support of this tariff. It is one of the few positive accomplishments of Mr. Tyler's so-called Presidency.
  • Do you believe that some revenue should be set aside from our tariffs to finance internal improvements, such as canals and roads?
    I don't believe that it is constitutional or advisable for the federal government to undertake an internal improvements program.
  • What is your current position on the banking system?
    I stand for a national bank, broadly similar to the late Second Bank of the United States.
  • Do you support an Amendment that would limit the President to a single term in office?
    This is a necessary step against the overreach and abuse of power of the Executive branch.
  • Aside from the issue of Texas, do you support the expansion of the United States in general? Into Oregon, other parts of Mexico, Cuba, etc.?
    I am against the annexation of Texas. And just to show that this does derive from sectional prejudice, I am also against expansion into Oregon or other regions.
  • Would you sign a law that lowered tariffs below the level needed to protect American industry from foreign imports?
    I would gladly sign such a bill into law.
  • Do you have any statement to make on John Calhoun's “Packenham Letter”, stating slavery to be a positive blessing, and justifying the annexation of Texas as a pro-slavery move?
    I disagree with John Calhoun across the board, which leads to my opposition to the annexation of Texas.
  • Do you agree with Robert Walker's letter, arguing that that slavery issue will be diluted by national expansion?
    I believe this letter to be disingenuous at best. Further expansion will reopen the debate on slavery rather than suppress it.
  • Regardless of your personal feelings, would you sign an act which established an independent Treasury for the government's funds?
    I would prefer a national bank, but I would be willing to sign a bill which created an independent Treasury.
  • What is your position on the Oregon boundary question?
    We need to negotiate a permanent agreement with Great Britain that grants some of all of the Oregon Territory to the United States.
  • Is there a particular state where your party should concentrate its resources and most talented speakers as the election draws near?
    Virginia