Campaign Trail Results: Game #801656

This Game:

  • Year: 1844
  • Player Candidate: James K. Polk
  • Running Mate: George Dallas
  • Difficulty Level: Normal
  • Winner Take All Mode?: Yes
  • Game Played:
Previous Game Next Game
View overall results, or a specific state:
CandidateElectoral VotesPopular VotesPop. Vote %
---- Henry Clay1951,396,14651.09
---- James K. Polk801,277,16646.73
---- James Birney059,5942.18
---- John Tyler000.00

Answers:

  • What points will emphasize in your acceptance letter, as you accept the Democratic nomination for President?
    I will open with a full-throated defense of the annexation of Texas. I will also express my support for our current banking system, and for large reductions to our tariff rate.
  • You are known as a supporter of annexation on the Texas front. Do you have anything you would like to add, now that you have been nominated?
    We must annex Texas immediately.
  • John Tyler is pleased with your position on the Texas issue, and is prepared to withdraw his candidacy. Can you give him assurances that certain appointees of his will be safe in their positions, should you be elected?
    Getting Tyler out of the race is worth it. He can send us a reasonable list of people who will stay on when we're elected.
  • Cassius Clay, a cousin of Henry Clay, has published a letter stating Henry Clay is in accord with the abolitionist movement. Should your party disseminate copies of this letter as an attack?
    That seems like a pretty obvious move to me. The Whigs have always had trouble finessing this issue.
  • Do you believe that any Southern Whig can call themselves a supporter of slavery, so long as Henry Clay equivocates on the Texas issue?
    We have the upper-hand here, and we need to hammer the Southern Whigs on their allegiance to a party that is drifting towards increasingly radical positions.
  • Do you have any statement on the presence of Theodore Frelinghuysen on the Whig ticket, and his association with known anti-Catholic agitators?
    We won't have much to say about Frelinghuysen. He seems to avoided the vices which have plagued Henry Clay throughout his life.
  • For better or worse, many view you as a protege of Andrew Jackson (some call you “Young Hickory”). Is it better to embrace this label, or to distance yourself from it?
    I am a personal friend of Andrew Jackson, and have repeatedly taken advice from him throughout my political career. I'm proud of this and I believe it to be an asset in this campaign.
  • Henry Clay supports the idea that the federal government should purchase the telegraph patent and manage the technology. To what extent should you attack him on this?
    This sounds like the most ridiculous idea yet from Mr. Clay's long public career. I trust that enterprising individuals and companies will develop this technology.
  • Should your party attack Henry Clay's personal conduct? His gambling, womanizing, dueling, and generally irreligious nature?
    We can emphasize in my own biography that I have led an upright life, without any taint to my personal conduct.
  • Silas Wright, the protege and successor to Van Buren, has been mentioned as a candidate for Governor of New York. He seems hesitant. Will you write him a letter imploring him to enter the race?
    I will put my word in as a supporter of Silas Wright.
  • There have recently been riots and armed clashes between nativists and Irish immigrants in Philadelphia and elsewhere. Do you have any plans to condemn the nativist violence in these episodes?
    I don't want to address civil disorder directly, but we should be clear that we oppose any changes to our naturalization laws.
  • What do you make of Martin Van Buren's 1842 visit to Henry Clay's estate? Is Clay too friendly with Northern interests?
    This episode shows that Mr. Clay is, at heart, an insider who is overly favorable to Northern politicians. It brings to mind the Corrupt Bargain of a prior election.
  • Would you support the annexation of Texas, even without an agreement with Mexico, and a possible war?
    The prospect of war with a backwards country such as Mexico should play no part in our calculations.
  • What should your party's position be on the Tariff of 1842, which increased tariffs?
    We must rescind this tariff and replace it with something much lower. I support free trade and low tariffs.
  • Do you believe that some revenue should be set aside from our tariffs to finance internal improvements, such as canals and roads?
    I don't believe that it is constitutional or advisable for the federal government to undertake an internal improvements program.
  • What is your current position on the banking system?
    I support our current free banking system, and I see no need for the Treasury to insulate its operations from the state-chartered banks.
  • Do you support an Amendment that would limit the President to a single term in office?
    I don't think that this is a necessary step, at this time.
  • Do you support the lifting of the Gag Rule in Congress?
    Regardless of our feelings about the slavery issue, it is undemocratic for Congress to deny the people the right to petition the government. I believe the Gag Rule should be lifted.
  • Aside from the issue of Texas, do you support the expansion of the United States in general? Into Oregon, other parts of Mexico, Cuba, etc.?
    I believe that the United States, in line with the “Manifest Destiny” ideal, should expand wherever feasible.
  • Do you have any statement to make on John Calhoun's “Packenham Letter”, stating slavery to be a positive blessing, and justifying the annexation of Texas as a pro-slavery move?
    I would not go to the lengths of John Calhoun, but Texas would certainly help expand the market for slavery in our country.
  • Do you support any changes to our current naturalization laws?
    Our current laws are in need of great revision, in light of the troubles we have had with recent immigrants.
  • Do you agree with Robert Walker's letter, arguing that that slavery issue will be diluted by national expansion?
    We won't address Mr. Walker's letter directly, but we are in favor of annexation.
  • After the unfortunate death of Abel Upshur in the Princeton explosion, John Calhoun succeeded him as Secretary of State. Was this a wise appointment by President Tyler?
    We don't have any plans to comment upon the Cabinet appointments of President Tyler.
  • Do you have any criticism of the authorities in Illinois, regarding their failure to properly protect Joseph Smith before his assassination in June?
    Regardless of our personal feelings, it always concerning when a religious leader and Presidential candidate can simply be killed by a mob.
  • Is there a particular state where your party should concentrate its resources and most talented speakers as the election draws near?
    Virginia