Campaign Trail Results: Game #790224

This Game:

  • Year: 1844
  • Player Candidate: James K. Polk
  • Running Mate: Levi Woodbury
  • Difficulty Level: Normal
  • Winner Take All Mode?: Yes
  • Game Played:
Previous Game Next Game
View overall results, or a specific state:
CandidateElectoral VotesPopular VotesPop. Vote %
---- Henry Clay1791,317,76248.70
---- James K. Polk961,253,09546.31
---- John Tyler071,7762.65
---- James Birney063,0232.33

Answers:

  • What points will emphasize in your acceptance letter, as you accept the Democratic nomination for President?
    I will open with a full-throated defense of the annexation of Texas. I will also express my support for our current banking system, and for large reductions to our tariff rate.
  • You are known as a supporter of annexation on the Texas front. Do you have anything you would like to add, now that you have been nominated?
    We must annex Texas immediately.
  • John Tyler is pleased with your position on the Texas issue, and is prepared to withdraw his candidacy. Can you give him assurances that certain appointees of his will be safe in their positions, should you be elected?
    John Tyler lacks any broad base of support. It's more important to reserve these appointments for loyal Democrats.
  • Can you elaborate on why your allies intervened so strongly on behalf of Levi Woodbury, to be your running mate?
    Mr. Woodbury was a critical part of Jackson and Van Buren's Cabinets, and he has the right viewpoint on the Treasury and tariff questions.
  • Cassius Clay, a cousin of Henry Clay, has published a letter stating Henry Clay is in accord with the abolitionist movement. Should your party disseminate copies of this letter as an attack?
    That seems like a pretty obvious move to me. The Whigs have always had trouble finessing this issue.
  • Do you believe that any Southern Whig can call themselves a supporter of slavery, so long as Henry Clay equivocates on the Texas issue?
    We have the upper-hand here, and we need to hammer the Southern Whigs on their allegiance to a party that is drifting towards increasingly radical positions.
  • Do you have any statement on the presence of Theodore Frelinghuysen on the Whig ticket, and his association with known anti-Catholic agitators?
    The Democratic Party is a friend of the working-class, and of immigrants from abroad. We denounce the vile bigotry of the Whig Party, as evidenced by Frelinghuysen.
  • For better or worse, many view you as a protege of Andrew Jackson (some call you “Young Hickory”). Is it better to embrace this label, or to distance yourself from it?
    I am a personal friend of Andrew Jackson, and have repeatedly taken advice from him throughout my political career. I'm proud of this and I believe it to be an asset in this campaign.
  • Henry Clay supports the idea that the federal government should purchase the telegraph patent and manage the technology. To what extent should you attack him on this?
    This sounds like the most ridiculous idea yet from Mr. Clay's long public career. I trust that enterprising individuals and companies will develop this technology.
  • Should your party attack Henry Clay's personal conduct? His gambling, womanizing, dueling, and generally irreligious nature?
    We can emphasize in my own biography that I have led an upright life, without any taint to my personal conduct.
  • Silas Wright, the protege and successor to Van Buren, has been mentioned as a candidate for Governor of New York. He seems hesitant. Will you write him a letter imploring him to enter the race?
    I will put my word in as a supporter of Silas Wright.
  • Do you believe that some revenue should be set aside from our tariffs to finance internal improvements, such as canals and roads?
    Only a very limited amount, for the most compelling projects. Otherwise the tariff should be for revenue purposes only.
  • There have recently been riots and armed clashes between nativists and Irish immigrants in Philadelphia and elsewhere. Do you have any plans to condemn the nativist violence in these episodes?
    The Whig Party attempts to stand apart from these nativist mobs, yet their own candidate for Vice President has associated with virulent anti-Catholics.
  • What do you make of Martin Van Buren's 1842 visit to Henry Clay's estate? Is Clay too friendly with Northern interests?
    This incident was a source of insinuation against Van Buren during the nomination battle. In the main election, however, we shouldn't mention anything that could cause a rift in the party.
  • Would you support the annexation of Texas, even without an agreement with Mexico, and a possible war?
    The prospect of war with a backwards country such as Mexico should play no part in our calculations.
  • What should your party's position be on the Tariff of 1842, which increased tariffs?
    We must rescind this tariff and replace it with something much lower. I support free trade and low tariffs.
  • What is your current position on the banking system?
    I will never support a national bank, but I do advocate an independent Treasury, so that federal funds won't be tied up in local speculations.
  • Do you support an Amendment that would limit the President to a single term in office?
    I don't think that this is a necessary step, at this time.
  • Would you sign a law that lowered tariffs below the level needed to protect American industry from foreign imports?
    I would gladly sign such a bill into law.
  • Do you have any statement to make on John Calhoun's “Packenham Letter”, stating slavery to be a positive blessing, and justifying the annexation of Texas as a pro-slavery move?
    We will frame Texas as an issue of national pride and national expansion. I rebuke the idea of Calhoun that this is purely a Southern enterprise.
  • Do you support any effort to establish a unified, national currency?
    Only if we could establish one without chartering a new national bank.
  • Do you agree with Robert Walker's letter, arguing that that slavery issue will be diluted by national expansion?
    We won't address Mr. Walker's letter directly, but we are in favor of annexation.
  • What is your position on the Oregon boundary question?
    We need to be just as aggressive on this issue as we are anywhere else. “Fifty-four Forty or Fight!”
  • Do you have any criticism of the authorities in Illinois, regarding their failure to properly protect Joseph Smith before his assassination in June?
    This is not an issue that we plan to address in our campaign.
  • Is there a particular state where your party should concentrate its resources and most talented speakers as the election draws near?
    New York