Campaign Trail Results: Game #751873

This Game:

  • Year: 1844
  • Player Candidate: James K. Polk
  • Running Mate: George Dallas
  • Difficulty Level: Normal
  • Winner Take All Mode?: Yes
  • Game Played:
  • pianoplayer027
Previous Game Next Game
View overall results, or a specific state:
CandidateElectoral VotesPopular VotesPop. Vote %
---- Henry Clay2121,334,52349.00
---- James K. Polk631,263,40046.39
---- John Tyler067,0392.46
---- James Birney058,5482.15

Answers:

  • What points will emphasize in your acceptance letter, as you accept the Democratic nomination for President?
    I will open with a full-throated defense of the annexation of Texas. I will also express my support for our current banking system, and for large reductions to our tariff rate.
  • You are known as a supporter of annexation on the Texas front. Do you have anything you would like to add, now that you have been nominated?
    We must annex Texas as soon as practicable.
  • John Tyler is pleased with your position on the Texas issue, and is prepared to withdraw his candidacy. Can you give him assurances that certain appointees of his will be safe in their positions, should you be elected?
    John Tyler lacks any broad base of support. It's more important to reserve these appointments for loyal Democrats.
  • Cassius Clay, a cousin of Henry Clay, has published a letter stating Henry Clay is in accord with the abolitionist movement. Should your party disseminate copies of this letter as an attack?
    Let's not appear too hasty here. We need to run as a national party and avoid alienating Northerners.
  • Do you believe that any Southern Whig can call themselves a supporter of slavery, so long as Henry Clay equivocates on the Texas issue?
    We have the upper-hand here, and we need to hammer the Southern Whigs on their allegiance to a party that is drifting towards increasingly radical positions.
  • Do you have any statement on the presence of Theodore Frelinghuysen on the Whig ticket, and his association with known anti-Catholic agitators?
    We won't have much to say about Frelinghuysen. He seems to avoided the vices which have plagued Henry Clay throughout his life.
  • For better or worse, many view you as a protege of Andrew Jackson (some call you “Young Hickory”). Is it better to embrace this label, or to distance yourself from it?
    There's no need to talk about Andrew Jackson at this point. Let's focus on Texas and other issues of our current time, rather than rehashing the battles of a decade ago.
  • Henry Clay supports the idea that the federal government should purchase the telegraph patent and manage the technology. To what extent should you attack him on this?
    We don't need to hammer on the internal improvements issue. We have other things to talk about which will better unite the party.
  • Should your party attack Henry Clay's personal conduct? His gambling, womanizing, dueling, and generally irreligious nature?
    The passions of these times seem to be towards someone who is more righteous in their behavior. We should attack Clay's conduct, and especially in the Northeast.
  • Silas Wright, the protege and successor to Van Buren, has been mentioned as a candidate for Governor of New York. He seems hesitant. Will you write him a letter imploring him to enter the race?
    I will put my word in as a supporter of Silas Wright.
  • There have recently been riots and armed clashes between nativists and Irish immigrants in Philadelphia and elsewhere. Do you have any plans to condemn the nativist violence in these episodes?
    The Whig Party attempts to stand apart from these nativist mobs, yet their own candidate for Vice President has associated with virulent anti-Catholics.
  • What do you make of Martin Van Buren's 1842 visit to Henry Clay's estate? Is Clay too friendly with Northern interests?
    This episode shows that Mr. Clay is, at heart, an insider who is overly favorable to Northern politicians. It brings to mind the Corrupt Bargain of a prior election.
  • Would you support the annexation of Texas, even without an agreement with Mexico, and a possible war?
    The prospect of war with a backwards country such as Mexico should play no part in our calculations.
  • What should your party's position be on the Tariff of 1842, which increased tariffs?
    We stand steadfast in support of this tariff. It is one of the few positive accomplishments of Mr. Tyler's so-called Presidency.
  • Do you believe that some revenue should be set aside from our tariffs to finance internal improvements, such as canals and roads?
    I don't believe that it is constitutional or advisable for the federal government to undertake an internal improvements program.
  • What is your current position on the banking system?
    I will never support a national bank, but I do advocate an independent Treasury, so that federal funds won't be tied up in local speculations.
  • Do you support an Amendment that would limit the President to a single term in office?
    This is a necessary step against the overreach and abuse of power of the Executive branch.
  • Do you support the lifting of the Gag Rule in Congress?
    We have no plans to address the Gag Rule during our campaign.
  • Do you have any statement to make on John Calhoun's “Packenham Letter”, stating slavery to be a positive blessing, and justifying the annexation of Texas as a pro-slavery move?
    We will frame Texas as an issue of national pride and national expansion. I rebuke the idea of Calhoun that this is purely a Southern enterprise.
  • Do you agree with Robert Walker's letter, arguing that that slavery issue will be diluted by national expansion?
    We won't address Mr. Walker's letter directly, but we are in favor of annexation.
  • After the unfortunate death of Abel Upshur in the Princeton explosion, John Calhoun succeeded him as Secretary of State. Was this a wise appointment by President Tyler?
    This is one of the most ill-conceived decisions I have seen in my lifetime.
  • Regardless of your personal feelings, would you sign an act which established an independent Treasury for the government's funds?
    I would prefer a national bank, but I would be willing to sign a bill which created an independent Treasury.
  • Do you have any criticism of the authorities in Illinois, regarding their failure to properly protect Joseph Smith before his assassination in June?
    This is not an issue that we plan to address in our campaign.
  • Aside from the issue of Texas, do you support the expansion of the United States in general? Into Oregon, other parts of Mexico, Cuba, etc.?
    Oregon is a different issue than that of Texas. In Oregon we have an existing, legitimate claim.
  • Is there a particular state where your party should concentrate its resources and most talented speakers as the election draws near?
    Virginia