Campaign Trail Results: Game #750663

This Game:

  • Year: 1988
  • Player Candidate: George Bush
  • Running Mate: Dan Quayle
  • Difficulty Level: Impossible
  • Winner Take All Mode?: Yes
  • Game Played:
Previous Game Next Game
View overall results, or a specific state:
CandidateElectoral VotesPopular VotesPop. Vote %
---- Michael Dukakis53855,446,97260.24
---- George Bush035,908,47339.02
---- Lenora Fulani/Other0363,2380.39
---- Ron Paul0318,6210.35

Visits:

  • Washington DC:12

Answers:

  • Are you willing to rule out any further increases to the federal income tax, if elected President?
    My opponent will raise taxes, and so will I. He won't tell you. I just did.
  • What message will you most emphasize as you accept the Republican Party nomination?
    We need to take the attack to the Democrats after the convention they put on, and specifically challenge Dukakis on defense, economics, and social issues.
  • How much will you emphasize your experience under Ronald Reagan, or in other roles, as you run for President?
    We don't plan to mention Ronald Reagan very much in this campaign. It is important to establish that I am my own man.
  • What points about your opponent, Michael Dukakis, will you emphasize as you campaign?
    Dukakis is a good man with a good record as Governor of Massachusetts. I prefer to focus on my own qualifications and experience for the job.
  • Would you endorse a constitutional amendment to ban abortion in the United States?
    I am a pro-life candidate, but I do not support an amendment for this purpose.
  • To what extent will your campaign attack the Massachusetts prison furlough program, and/or the murder committed by Willie Horton?
    I believe this is the kind of thing which might backfire on us. Voters want solutions, not petty attacks.
  • To what extent will you attack the veto, by Dukakis, of a bill requiring teachers to lead their students in the Pledge of Allegiance?
    Mr. Dukakis was simply following the law as handed down in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette. I don't think this type of attack will resonate with voters.
  • To what extent will you attack Dukakis's opposition to the military actions in Granada and Libya?
    Reasonable people can disagree on the merits of these actions. We don't have much to gain by bringing them into the campaign.
  • To what extent will you attack Dukakis's bill, in 1971, to decriminalize sodomy and bestiality in the Massachusetts Congress?
    I think we need to preserve a level of dignity in this campaign, and talking about things like sodomy and bestiality might be a little bit too far for some people.
  • To what extent will you emphasize Dukakis's claim to be a “card-carrying” member of the ACLU in your campaign attacks?
    People have different opinions about the ACLU. I won't go into it too much on this campaign.
  • Do you have anything to say about the Iran-Contra affair, and can you reassure voters that you were not involved?
    I should have been more aware that something was going on, based on some meetings I attended, and I regret not doing more to stop this at the time.
  • Ronald Reagan referred to Michael Dukakis as an “invalid” during a recent speech. Do you care to make any comment on that?
    Mr. Reagan's words are his own. I admire the President, but I would never go so far as to throw names at our opponent.
  • Do you have anything to say about your relationship with Manuel Noriega of Panama?
    I regret not taking active steps, as CIA Director, to limit our dealings with Manuel Noriega in the 1970s.
  • Your selection of Dan Quayle has raised serious eyebrows, even among Republicans. What role will he play in your fall campaign?
    The announcement of Quayle didn't go over quite like we wanted to. Let's have him campaign in safely Republican areas for the time being, until this furor subsides.
  • Observers widely believe that Dan Quayle lost the Vice Presidential debate to Lloyd Bentsen. Do you agree?
    That's a ridiculous statement. Of course some partisan Democrats are making that case, but Mr. Quayle more than held his own.
  • To what extent will your campaign focus on your service as an airman in World War II?
    Obviously we'll mention this some, but our main focus will be on the here and now.
  • What is your position on capital punishment?
    I believe that capital punishment is ineffective at reducing crime, and is not applied in an equal manner. I do not support the practice.
  • Are protectionist measures of some kind needed to counteract the dominance of Japan in foreign trade?
    We have taken too many steps to expand world trade without adequately protecting American workers from the consequences. I would definitely run a more protectionist Administration.
  • Do you believe that voluntary prayer should be allowed in the nation's classrooms?
    I'm not touching this issue with a ten foot pole. If anyone asks, I will deflect deflect deflect.
  • Do you support additional gun control measures at the federal level?
    I believe that we need to consider any measure to reduce our nation's crime epidemic, including new gun control legislation.
  • What will you do as President to reduce the federal deficit?
    We need to combine fiscal prudence with limited tax increases on our most prosperous citizens.
  • What measures should be taken to assist states, such as Texas, which have been hurt by the recent crash in oil prices?
    I believe that American companies should every right to bid on foreign oil contracts with our allies.
  • Could more have been done to prevent the current farm crisis, which has devastated the upper Midwest?
    We could have stabilized this situation much earlier with aggressive intervention from the federal government. This is the type of thing I would have done if I were President.
  • Where will you spend your final day of the campaign?
    California.
  • Will you continue the tradition of debating your opponent in the month before the election?
    I'd prefer to avoid that kind of thing if we can.