Campaign Trail Results: Game #726980

This Game:

  • Year: 1844
  • Player Candidate: Henry Clay
  • Running Mate: Theodore Frelinghuysen
  • Difficulty Level: Normal
  • Winner Take All Mode?: Yes
  • Game Played:
  • chrisandhelen78
Previous Game Next Game
View overall results, or a specific state:
CandidateElectoral VotesPopular VotesPop. Vote %
---- James K. Polk2161,416,60751.57
---- Henry Clay591,239,72645.13
---- James Birney090,6933.30
---- John Tyler000.00

Answers:

  • Martin Van Buren, Democrat and President until 1841, will be making a tour of the country to visit various friends and political figures. Will you extend the invitation for him to stay at your estate for a few days?
    This would be a strictly personal invite. We are friends. And besides, it might blunt some opposition to my candidacy from New York.
  • What points will emphasize in your acceptance letter, as you accept the Whig nomination for President?
    I will avoid any mention of Texas. The main focus of my acceptance will be an elucidation of my economic principles, including a national bank, a tariff, and internal improvemnets.
  • What position will you take on the Texas annexation issue?
    This discussion has grown tiresome, but I will continue to advocate for a moderate solution on this issue.
  • The background of your running mate, Theodore Frelinghuysen, has caused much distress among the Catholics of this country? Will you make any statements on this issue?
    We need to address these concerns and state categorically that the Whigs support our current naturalization laws and do not stand for nativism.
  • There have recently been riots and armed clashes between nativists and Irish immigrants in Philadelphia and elsewhere. Do you have any plans to condemn the Irish violence in these episodes?
    After a few days have passed and tempers have cooled, let us reemphasize our support for current naturalization laws.
  • Cassius Clay, your cousin, has published a letter stating you are in accord with the abolitionist movement. How will you respond to this?
    We must attack Cassius Clay's statements at once, for the dishonest falsehoods that they are. I am in no way an abolitionist in this debate.
  • There are a number of attacks which focus on your fondness for horse-racing, drinking, gambling, female conversation, and the like. Do you have a response to this?
    I've undertaken the amusements of our times, perhaps a little more than most, but it has never had any bearing on the work I have done.
  • Do you plan to make any attacks against the Liberty Party, a radical abolitionist group that is fielding a third party candidate?
    Thomas Birney is a stooge of the Democrats, attempting to agitate emotions and divide our party. People ought to feel free to vote for him if they want to hand this election to James K. Polk.
  • Do you still support the idea that the federal government should purchase the telegraph patent and manage the technology?
    I absolutely believe that the development of telegraph lines should take its place alongside canals, harbors, and railroads as a national prerogative.
  • Was there really a bargain (a “Corrupt Bargain” to many) between yourself and John Quincy Adams which elevated him to the Presidency in 1825?
    I don't know how many times a man can deny an unjust allegation before fatigue sets in.
  • Does it make sense to attack Northern Democrats as enablers and fellow travelers of the Southern slavery expansion?
    We should attack the Northern Democrats on their opposition to, or flip-flopping on, the issues of tariffs and internal improvements. They are on soft ground in that debate.
  • Is there something you can do to give the Southern Whigs political cover from the incessant attacks that they are in league with an anti-slavery party?
    I am opposed to radicalism from any region, and that includes anti-slavery radicalism. The Whig Party is a national party with a national program that will benefit all regions equally.
  • What should your party's position be on the Tariff of 1842, which increased tariffs?
    We stand steadfast in support of this tariff. It is one of the few positive accomplishments of Mr. Tyler's so-called Presidency.
  • Do you believe that some revenue should be set aside from our tariffs to finance internal improvements, such as canals and roads?
    This is one of the key objectives of our current tariff policy, and I would support a strong infrastructure program as President.
  • What is your current position on the banking system?
    I stand for a national bank or an independent Treasury -- whichever can gain the most support. I would require any national bank to maintain a branch in every state.
  • Do you support an Amendment that would limit the President to a single term in office?
    This is a necessary step against the overreach and abuse of power of the Executive branch.
  • Do you support the lifting of the Gag Rule in Congress?
    We have no plans to address the Gag Rule during our campaign.
  • Would you sign a law that lowered tariffs below the level needed to protect American industry from foreign imports?
    I would be forced to veto such a measure as President.
  • Do you have any statement to make on John Calhoun's “Packenham Letter”, stating slavery to be a positive blessing, and justifying the annexation of Texas as a pro-slavery move?
    I would not go to the lengths of John Calhoun, but Texas would certainly help expand the market for slavery in our country.
  • Do you support any changes to our current naturalization laws?
    I support our current naturalization laws as they stand.
  • Do you support any effort to establish a unified, national currency?
    I support a national bank, and one clear argument for the bank is the total chaos we've had with our currency since 1837.
  • After the unfortunate death of Abel Upshur in the Princeton explosion, John Calhoun succeeded him as Secretary of State. Was this a wise appointment by President Tyler?
    This is one of the most ill-conceived decisions I have seen in my lifetime.
  • What is your position on the Oregon boundary question?
    We need to negotiate a permanent agreement with Great Britain that grants some of all of the Oregon Territory to the United States.
  • Is there a particular state where your party should concentrate its resources and most talented speakers as the election draws near?
    New York
  • Aside from the issue of Texas, do you support the expansion of the United States in general? Into Oregon, other parts of Mexico, Cuba, etc.?
    Oregon is a different issue than that of Texas. In Oregon we have an existing, legitimate claim.