Campaign Trail Results: Game #689228
Play The Campaign Trail
This Game:
- Year: 1860
- Player Candidate: Stephen A. Douglas
- Running Mate: Horatio Seymour
- Difficulty Level: Easy
- Winner Take All Mode?: Yes
- Game Played:
View overall results, or a specific state:
| Candidate | Electoral Votes | Popular Votes | Pop. Vote % |
|---|---|---|---|
| ---- Abraham Lincoln | 104 | 1,723,719 | 37.04 |
| ---- Stephen A. Douglas | 88 | 1,401,029 | 30.10 |
| ---- John C. Breckinridge | 58 | 891,915 | 19.17 |
| ---- John Bell | 53 | 637,149 | 13.69 |
Answers:
- How should your party address the slavery issue during this campaign?I had hoped that popular sovereignty would resolve the slavery issue, but the intransigence of the Southern bolters has convinced me otherwise. I now believe that slavery must not be permitted in any new state or territory.
- What do you have to say about the merits of your running mate, Horatio Seymour?I'm proud to share a ballot with Horatio Seymour of New York.
- To what extent do you plan to personally campaign in this election?I will break precedent by actively campaigning, and I will focus my stops in the state of Illinois.
- How aggressively should your party attack the Republicans and Abraham Lincoln in this election?We'll attack the Republicans the same as any other opponents.
- How aggressively should your party attack the Constitutional Unionists and John Bell in this election?This party has no discernible platform or political positions on any issue. They are the carcass of the pro-slavery wing of the Whig Party, masquerading as saviors of the Union.
- How aggressively should your party attack the Southern Democrats and John Breckenridge in this election?We need to make it perfectly clear that we have no use for this secessionist splinter group, and that we are a national party that truly represents Democracy in this country.
- Will you keep your name on the ballot in Oregon and California, even if doing so might divide the anti-Lincoln vote?No, I will not. I have a good chance of winning them and I need every vote I can get.
- Did you make any deals to reward New York in your administration, to get Horatio Seymour to agree to serve as your running mate?That's ridiculous. Of course not!
- What should your party's position be on the raid of John Brown, late in 1859?We will condemn the activity of any such self-styled revolutionaries. John Brown was a fanatic and a lunatic.
- Do you have any comment on the paramilitary “Wide Awake” clubs that have marched in support of Republicans?Every party has political clubs and supporters. There's no reason to take special alarm at the Wide Awakes.
- Should your party continue its familiar attacks on the “black Republicans” as abolitionists and supporters of social and political equality for blacks?I'm sure people out there will make these attacks on their own initiative, but we shouldn't emphasize this too much.
- What position should your party take on the tariff question in this election?Let's moderate our stance on the tariff issue a bit, given the peculiar nature of this election. Even President Buchanan appears to be changing his views.
- How much should your party emphasize its support of a Transcontinental Railroad in this election?Of course we'll support this railroad, but there are other issues we should emphasize in this campaign.
- How much should your party emphasize its support of a homestead act in this election?Anyone can see that we support this idea, but our main emphasis should be on other issues.
- What position should your party take on foreign immigration and nationalization in this election?Let's skirt this issue and attempt to focus our campaign on other things. There's not much for us to gain here.
- What is your position on the Supreme Court's Dred Scott v. Sandford decision?We join the Republicans in denouncing this decision. We may have our differences, but we can all agree that this Court has acted well beyond its bounds in this case.
- Do you have anything to say about the efforts of some to reopen the Atlantic slave trade?This is the type of aggressive, expansive move by the Southern Democrats that led to the split in our party. Under no circumstances would I support the reopening of the Atlantic slave trade.
- Do you support the further expansion of the United States into Mexico, Cuba, or the Caribbean?This is an abstract question at this point. We can barely hold this country together as it is, without addressing some theoretical expansion into the Caribbean.
- What is your position on the passage of “personal liberty laws” by various states, to flout the Fugitive Slave Act?I'm not going to make any statements condemning these laws during the present campaign. That would be a hasty, alienating move on our part.
- Would you support a compromise Amendment which permanently protected slavery in the Southern states, in return for no further expansion of the institution?I would need to see the details of these Amendments before I could take a position.
- If any Southern state was to secede, would you use military force as President to preserve the Union?Let there be no question that I support the preservation of the Union above all else.
- Do you believe that a Republican victory would result in a flood of free blacks into Northern states and western territories?We should hold back on this kind of rhetoric, given the unusual nature of this year's election.
- Should the proposed constitution for the state of Kansas be accepted by Congress, and Kansas admitted as a free state?This action is perfectly in line with my own doctrine. The will of the voters in Kansas clearly calls for admission as a free state.
- Is there a particular state that you would concentrate your efforts on during the final days of the campaign?I will make one final stop in New York to campaign.
- What is your opinion on the formation of fusion tickets in the Northern states to consolidate the anti-Lincoln vote?I will support any fusion tickets which can be organized, and I will withdraw my name from the slave state ballots. We must find a way to stop Lincoln.