Campaign Trail Results: Game #677279

This Game:

  • Year: 1844
  • Player Candidate: James K. Polk
  • Running Mate: Levi Woodbury
  • Difficulty Level: Impossible
  • Winner Take All Mode?: Yes
  • Game Played:
  • etorellovin
Previous Game Next Game
View overall results, or a specific state:
CandidateElectoral VotesPopular VotesPop. Vote %
---- Henry Clay2331,485,36154.16
---- James K. Polk421,130,17541.21
---- John Tyler069,1992.52
---- James Birney058,0382.12

Answers:

  • What points will emphasize in your acceptance letter, as you accept the Democratic nomination for President?
    I will open with a full-throated defense of the annexation of Texas. I will also express my support for our current banking system, and for large reductions to our tariff rate.
  • You are known as a supporter of annexation on the Texas front. Do you have anything you would like to add, now that you have been nominated?
    We must annex Texas immediately.
  • John Tyler is pleased with your position on the Texas issue, and is prepared to withdraw his candidacy. Can you give him assurances that certain appointees of his will be safe in their positions, should you be elected?
    John Tyler lacks any broad base of support. It's more important to reserve these appointments for loyal Democrats.
  • Can you elaborate on why your allies intervened so strongly on behalf of Levi Woodbury, to be your running mate?
    Mr. Woodbury was a critical part of Jackson and Van Buren's Cabinets, and he has the right viewpoint on the Treasury and tariff questions.
  • Cassius Clay, a cousin of Henry Clay, has published a letter stating Henry Clay is in accord with the abolitionist movement. Should your party disseminate copies of this letter as an attack?
    Let's not appear too hasty here. We need to run as a national party and avoid alienating Northerners.
  • Do you believe that any Southern Whig can call themselves a supporter of slavery, so long as Henry Clay equivocates on the Texas issue?
    We have the upper-hand here, and we need to hammer the Southern Whigs on their allegiance to a party that is drifting towards increasingly radical positions.
  • Do you have any statement on the presence of Theodore Frelinghuysen on the Whig ticket, and his association with known anti-Catholic agitators?
    We won't have much to say about Frelinghuysen. He seems to avoided the vices which have plagued Henry Clay throughout his life.
  • For better or worse, many view you as a protege of Andrew Jackson (some call you “Young Hickory”). Is it better to embrace this label, or to distance yourself from it?
    There's no need to talk about Andrew Jackson at this point. Let's focus on Texas and other issues of our current time, rather than rehashing the battles of a decade ago.
  • Henry Clay supports the idea that the federal government should purchase the telegraph patent and manage the technology. To what extent should you attack him on this?
    We don't need to hammer on the internal improvements issue. We have other things to talk about which will better unite the party.
  • Should your party attack Henry Clay's personal conduct? His gambling, womanizing, dueling, and generally irreligious nature?
    I don't think that personal conduct is a good issue to bring into this campaign.
  • Silas Wright, the protege and successor to Van Buren, has been mentioned as a candidate for Governor of New York. He seems hesitant. Will you write him a letter imploring him to enter the race?
    This is an issue of state politics that I will stay removed from.
  • There have recently been riots and armed clashes between nativists and Irish immigrants in Philadelphia and elsewhere. Do you have any plans to condemn the nativist violence in these episodes?
    Our national party should avoid addressing this issue.
  • What do you make of Martin Van Buren's 1842 visit to Henry Clay's estate? Is Clay too friendly with Northern interests?
    This episode shows that Mr. Clay is, at heart, an insider who is overly favorable to Northern politicians. It brings to mind the Corrupt Bargain of a prior election.
  • Would you support the annexation of Texas, even without an agreement with Mexico, and a possible war?
    I would hope that we could negotiate an annexation with Mexico before moving forward, to avoid any diplomatic incidents.
  • What should your party's position be on the Tariff of 1842, which increased tariffs?
    We must rescind this tariff and replace it with something much lower. I support free trade and low tariffs.
  • Do you believe that some revenue should be set aside from our tariffs to finance internal improvements, such as canals and roads?
    I don't believe that it is constitutional or advisable for the federal government to undertake an internal improvements program.
  • What is your current position on the banking system?
    I support our current free banking system, and I see no need for the Treasury to insulate its operations from the state-chartered banks.
  • Do you support an Amendment that would limit the President to a single term in office?
    I don't think that this is a necessary step, at this time.
  • Do you support the lifting of the Gag Rule in Congress?
    Congress must function in an orderly fashion, without taking time out from its business to receive ill-conceived petitions. I support the Gag Rule.
  • Would you sign a law that lowered tariffs below the level needed to protect American industry from foreign imports?
    I would gladly sign such a bill into law.
  • Do you agree with Robert Walker's letter, arguing that that slavery issue will be diluted by national expansion?
    We won't address Mr. Walker's letter directly, but we are in favor of annexation.
  • Regardless of your personal feelings, would you sign an act which established an independent Treasury for the government's funds?
    I support our current banking system, and would not support any ill-conceived attempts to centralize our finances.
  • What is your position on the Oregon boundary question?
    We need to be just as aggressive on this issue as we are anywhere else. “Fifty-four Forty or Fight!”
  • Do you have any criticism of the authorities in Illinois, regarding their failure to properly protect Joseph Smith before his assassination in June?
    Regardless of our personal feelings, it always concerning when a religious leader and Presidential candidate can simply be killed by a mob.
  • Is there a particular state where your party should concentrate its resources and most talented speakers as the election draws near?
    Virginia