Campaign Trail Results: Game #640633

This Game:

  • Year: 1844
  • Player Candidate: Henry Clay
  • Running Mate: John Sergeant
  • Difficulty Level: Normal
  • Winner Take All Mode?: Yes
  • Game Played:
  • jacktommy114
Previous Game Next Game
View overall results, or a specific state:
CandidateElectoral VotesPopular VotesPop. Vote %
---- James K. Polk2471,456,50254.33
---- Henry Clay281,207,99445.06
---- James Birney016,2680.61
---- John Tyler000.00

Answers:

  • Martin Van Buren, Democrat and President until 1841, will be making a tour of the country to visit various friends and political figures. Will you extend the invitation for him to stay at your estate for a few days?
    This would be a strictly personal invite. We are friends. And besides, it might blunt some opposition to my candidacy from New York.
  • What points will emphasize in your acceptance letter, as you accept the Whig nomination for President?
    I stand opposed to any annexation of Texas. It will reopen settled questions and distract our nation from its important political issues, such as economic development.
  • What position will you take on the Texas annexation issue?
    This discussion has grown tiresome, but let me restate that I oppose the annexation of Texas.
  • Regardless of your views on the banking question, many accuse your running mate of being too closely tied to the Second Bank of the United States, and too inexperienced in government. What is your response?
    Let's continue to emphasize our platform and my own experience in government, which dates to the War of 1812.
  • There have recently been riots and armed clashes between nativists and Irish immigrants in Philadelphia and elsewhere. Do you have any plans to condemn the Irish violence in these episodes?
    After a few days have passed and tempers have cooled, let us reemphasize our support for current naturalization laws.
  • Cassius Clay, your cousin, has published a letter stating you are in accord with the abolitionist movement. How will you respond to this?
    We must put out a letter, clarifying that we only support abolition if slaveholders can be fairly compensated, with reasonable notice, and if freed slaves can be recolonized to Africa.
  • There are a number of attacks which focus on your fondness for horse-racing, drinking, gambling, female conversation, and the like. Do you have a response to this?
    In anticipation of this attack, I've actually made some effort in the past year or so to scale back my amusements. I don't believe it is ever too late for a man to change their conduct.
  • Do you plan to make any attacks against the Liberty Party, a radical abolitionist group that is fielding a third party candidate?
    I am steadfast against the annexation of Texas and the expansion of slavery. I believe that Birney's followers should be made aware of this point.
  • Do you still support the idea that the federal government should purchase the telegraph patent and manage the technology?
    I absolutely believe that the development of telegraph lines should take its place alongside canals, harbors, and railroads as a national prerogative.
  • Was there really a bargain (a “Corrupt Bargain” to many) between yourself and John Quincy Adams which elevated him to the Presidency in 1825?
    I don't know how many times a man can deny an unjust allegation before fatigue sets in.
  • Does it make sense to attack Northern Democrats as enablers and fellow travelers of the Southern slavery expansion?
    My opposition to the annexation of Texas is known, but we could more explicitly tie that maneuver to the expansion of slavery.
  • Is there something you can do to give the Southern Whigs political cover from the incessant attacks that they are in league with an anti-slavery party?
    I am opposed to radicalism from any region, and that includes anti-slavery radicalism. The Whig Party is a national party with a national program that will benefit all regions equally.
  • What should your party's position be on the Tariff of 1842, which increased tariffs?
    The primary purpose of our tariffs should be revenue. But should a small amount of protection incidentally occur from our tariff policy, that is acceptable.
  • Do you believe that some revenue should be set aside from our tariffs to finance internal improvements, such as canals and roads?
    This is one of the key objectives of our current tariff policy, and I would support a strong infrastructure program as President.
  • What is your current position on the banking system?
    I will never support a national bank, but I do advocate an independent Treasury, so that federal funds won't be tied up in local speculations.
  • Do you support an Amendment that would limit the President to a single term in office?
    This is a necessary step against the overreach and abuse of power of the Executive branch.
  • Aside from the issue of Texas, do you support the expansion of the United States in general? Into Oregon, other parts of Mexico, Cuba, etc.?
    I am against the annexation of Texas. And just to show that this does derive from sectional prejudice, I am also against expansion into Oregon or other regions.
  • Would you sign a law that lowered tariffs below the level needed to protect American industry from foreign imports?
    I would be forced to veto such a measure as President.
  • Do you have any statement to make on John Calhoun's “Packenham Letter”, stating slavery to be a positive blessing, and justifying the annexation of Texas as a pro-slavery move?
    We will frame Texas as an issue of national pride and national expansion. I rebuke the idea of Calhoun that this is purely a Southern enterprise.
  • Do you support any changes to our current naturalization laws?
    Our current laws are in need of great revision, in light of the troubles we have had with recent immigrants.
  • Do you support any effort to establish a unified, national currency?
    I support a national bank, and one clear argument for the bank is the total chaos we've had with our currency since 1837.
  • Regardless of your personal feelings, would you sign an act which established an independent Treasury for the government's funds?
    The independent Treasury is a halfway measure, designed to cover for the disaster that was the war against the Second Bank of the United States.
  • What is your position on the Oregon boundary question?
    We need to be just as aggressive on this issue as we are anywhere else. “Fifty-four Forty or Fight!”
  • Do you have any criticism of the authorities in Illinois, regarding their failure to properly protect Joseph Smith before his assassination in June?
    This is not an issue that we plan to address in our campaign.
  • Is there a particular state where your party should concentrate its resources and most talented speakers as the election draws near?
    Pennsylvania