Campaign Trail Results: Game #91269

This Game:

  • Year: 1860
  • Player Candidate: Stephen A. Douglas
  • Running Mate: Herschel Johnson
  • Difficulty Level: Impossible
  • Winner Take All Mode?: Yes
  • Game Played:
  • TomKearns
Previous Game Next Game
View overall results, or a specific state:
CandidateElectoral VotesPopular VotesPop. Vote %
---- Abraham Lincoln1792,008,48743.15
---- John C. Breckinridge87914,25319.64
---- John Bell33670,95814.41
---- Stephen A. Douglas11,061,12422.80

Answers:

  • To what extent do you plan to personally campaign in this election?
    It's a bold move, but I will campaign for the Democratic cause across the North.
  • How should your party address the slavery issue during this campaign?
    The threat of a Southern schism has forced our hand. We must accept the protection of slavery in federal territories, and protect the instution in future states like Kansas and New Mexico.
  • What do you have to say about the merits of your running mate, Herschel Johnson?
    I'm proud to share a ballot with Herschel Vespasian Johnson of Georgia.
  • How aggressively should your party attack the Republicans and Abraham Lincoln in this election?
    We may have our issues with Lincoln, but our primary attacks should be reserved for the duplicitous Southern party, and the ambiguous Constitutional Union organization.
  • How aggressively should your party attack the Constitutional Unionists and John Bell in this election?
    This party has no discernible platform or political positions on any issue. They are the carcass of the pro-slavery wing of the Whig Party, masquerading as saviors of the Union.
  • How aggressively should your party attack the Southern Democrats and John Breckenridge in this election?
    We need to make it perfectly clear that we have no use for this secessionist splinter group, and that we are a national party that truly represents Democracy in this country.
  • What is your opinion on the formation of fusion tickets in the Northern states to consolidate the anti-Lincoln vote?
    We cannot sacrifice the prestige of the Democratic Party by making these kinds of deals.
  • Will you keep your name on the ballot in Oregon and California, even if doing so might divide the anti-Lincoln vote?
    No, I will not. I have a good chance of winning them and I need every vote I can get.
  • What should your party's position be on the raid of John Brown, late in 1859?
    We will keep silent on this episode as we campaign.
  • Do you have any comment on the paramilitary “Wide Awake” clubs that have marched in support of Republicans?
    Every party has political clubs and supporters. There's no reason to take special alarm at the Wide Awakes.
  • Should your party continue its familiar attacks on the “black Republicans” as abolitionists and supporters of social and political equality for blacks?
    It might be in our best interest to play down such rhetoric in this particular campaign. Our base in the North will vote for us anyway, and it's not as if we have any Southern support to lose at this point.
  • What position should your party take on the tariff question in this election?
    Let's moderate our stance on the tariff issue a bit, given the peculiar nature of this election. Even President Buchanan appears to be changing his views.
  • How much should your party emphasize its support of a Transcontinental Railroad in this election?
    Of course we'll support this railroad, but there are other issues we should emphasize in this campaign.
  • How much should your party emphasize its support of a homestead act in this election?
    This has been a Democratic idea since the days of Andrew Jackson. We support it completely.
  • What position should your party take on foreign immigration and nationalization in this election?
    We will attack the Republican embrace of immigration as opportunistic and disingenuous. It doesn't take a genius to figure out which party the Know Nothings joined.
  • What is your position on the Supreme Court's Dred Scott v. Sandford decision?
    We join the Republicans in denouncing this decision. We may have our differences, but we can all agree that this Court has acted well beyond its bounds in this case.
  • Do you have anything to say about the efforts of some to reopen the Atlantic slave trade?
    Let's keep a low profile on this issue and hope it passes. We don't need to make things worse by issuing controversial statements.
  • Do you support the further expansion of the United States into Mexico, Cuba, or the Caribbean?
    I don't support the further expansion of the United States. We should be focused on the development of the territories that we have, and not on gaining new ones.
  • What is your position on the passage of “personal liberty laws” by various states, to flout the Fugitive Slave Act?
    I'm not going to make any statements condemning these laws during the present campaign. That would be a hasty, alienating move on our part.
  • Would you support a compromise Amendment which permanently protected slavery in the Southern states, in return for no further expansion of the institution?
    Not really. I'm all for compromise between the sections, but how could we have a permanent Amendment to the Constitution? Couldn't we have another Amendment to amend that Amendment?
  • If any Southern state was to secede, would you use military force as President to preserve the Union?
    Let there be no question that I support the preservation of the Union above all else.
  • Do you believe that a Republican victory would result in a flood of free blacks into Northern states and western territories?
    We should hold back on this kind of rhetoric, given the unusual nature of this year's election.
  • Should the proposed constitution for the state of Kansas be accepted by Congress, and Kansas admitted as a free state?
    Part of any future compromise with Southern interests may involve the admission of Kansas as a slave state. We should not preclude that possibility at the current time.
  • Should your party make any statements indicating the potential support of a national bank in this election?
    This bank issue is dead and buried, and the Democrats won. Why would we possibly want to revive it and take a different position?
  • Is there a particular state that you would concentrate your efforts on during the final days of the campaign?
    Our case is hopeless in this election. I will go south and speak out against secession, to the best of my capacity.